Product and Process Evaluation of Huxley 3D Printer

Product and Process valuation of Huxley 3D PrinterProduct developing for choiceAdemola AdewoyeQuality engineering, convergence and process paygradeHuxley 3D Printer Quality Gurus courseworkAbstratThis article refers to a coursework of result exploitation for part to which answers ar endured for drumheads as related to harvest development for quality coursework1. This report is dived into two part A consists of question and answers for Huxley 3D in the altogetherspaperman and part B comprising quality gurus analyses.AimsTo extend the know students ability to apply formulate methodology and discernment techniques associated with quality engineering in broad context of managing the engineering and target process.ObjectivesThe core objectives employed include the pursual.Teaming to assemble 3D Huxley printer judgement and evaluating the design reproach with comparative analysesUnderstanding quality, quality development, and quality design fundamentals.exploring the q uality gurus philosophersLearning about quality operation and management chain of mountains of the workThis article is limited to answers to product development for quality coursework and evaluation of quality gurus titled quality engineering, product and process evaluation.Significant of the studyIn context of technical skills, I had learnt new technical skills e.g. congregation of disassemble mold as one worked upon the 3D Huxley printer. I as considerably worked with external fatherd students in modelling and produce of different move. The take care and knowledge gained is never quantified hence this study is significant to helping students underdeveloped a possible technical skills.Chapter one get around A1.0 abbreviated introductionA Huxley 3D printer is a robust trine dimensional rapid prototyping machine developed by Erik Debruijn and other and named aft(prenominal) a biologist Thomas henry Huxley. It is a mechatronic machine consisting of mechanically skillful atoms such as timing belt, nuts, run offs, bearings, extruder, x, y and z axis corpses and electrical instalment such as electric motor, microprocessor, and converter.This machine is controlled by a firmware and a host software configured to convert a 3D design from any CAD related software into a physical design called rapid prototype opinion. This 3D printer are flexible, fast, trendy and easy to use.Chapter two2.0 Assemble the Huxley 3D printer utilize the supplier online instruction and once complete demonstrate the machine as a working systems.2.0 AnswerThe 3D Huxley printed was assembled by my group and was rangeally demonstrated.3.0 Compare the following aspect of your accomplished machine with one completed another machine built by your comrade groups. Report on what do you observe to be the factors affecting the followingIndividual component qualitySystem consistency when compared to other completed Huxley 3D printers ambiguity and opportunity for error in the in struction set3.0 AnswerThe following observations were made in comparison with other match groups in term of quality.Coupling or assemblage accuracy and orientation are factors that affects the return of the printout in terms of quality as was observe during testing of peer A and peer B machine. One peer machine form better surface conclude than the other observed to be as a result of poor orientation of vertical and horizontal come in up split.The plastic frames were also observed not properly fillet with no allowance which bars performance and quality of printing.Electronic components such as the electric motor positioning was observed not labelled and diagrammatized.Generally, the several(prenominal) components of the Huxley 3D printer was affected by lack of surface make out and inaccurate labelling.The following observations were made in comparison with other peer in term of system consistencyAll the electric component e.g. electric motor provided the was observed co nsistent in both peersmajor(ip) mechanical components such as bearings, x-y-z rods, axis-belt drive, pulley and shaft, provided by supplier was observed consistent.All major frame componentsGenerally, the factors which affects systems consistency are labelling and specifications. Mechanical components parts such as nut were not threaded with precision Part was observed to be excess.The following was observed a major factors answerable for systems ambiguity and opportunity for error in comparison with other peers.as well many component partsPart dimensional inaccuracyPoor labellingas well many axesPoor surface finish of parts.4.0 Based on your observations rede how the quality of the system as well the user experience could be improved.4.0 AnswersBased on my experience gained and observations made during the course of the study I suggest the following for system quality approach.parts should be simplify to improve design optimisationNozzle could be modified to bring low dimension of 0.3mm or less for high quality surface finishIncrease the number of extruder to differentiate support materials from printing material when printing or prototyping composite design.Improve the slice settingIncrease driveAccurate parts labelling for easy and better assemblage.Frame rigidity could be supported by other methods of joining e.g. riveting to provide frame structure a solid rigidity.Post treatment (rework) of Huxley 3D printer parts could help to ensuring part are produced to standards e.g. uniform dimensions of frame rods, bolt and nuts.Thermoplastic mini-spool (printing material holder) should be inclusive in design parts to store sufficient amount of filament when the machine in operation.The x-carriage mount fan should be designed in two parts for in force(p) and speedy cooling of printing parts.An additional nuttraps in substitute of self-tapping hunch with metal screw should be used for the carriage for better quality finish.In regards to user experience the expressions below are suggestedMore practical sessions should be allocated to students offering this module to facilitate their real know-how technical skills of the crush matter.The assembly of the machine should be individual with group analyses, suggestion and estimate to ensure an independent knowledge transfer.Exhibition, seminar should be held and best student equilibrize to motivate students to go extra-ordinary.Part BDiscus your personal experience for this project making specific reference to ethos captured by the terms cypher defect as used by Philip CrosbyFitness for purpose as used by Joe Juranconstant approach as advocated by mensuration ConwayAnswerThe quality guru Philip Cosby defines quality with his four principles of quality management as follows quality is conformance to requirements, defect prevention is preferable to quality recap, quality is measured in monetary terms and Zero geo transparent fault (ZD) as quality standard as main focus as concerned this article. The need of technological advancement and commercialization of 3D printing for all is observed a genuine requirement for 3D development just substandard finished parts, poor labelling and other defects observed during the machine assembly in the course of the practical study was as a results of a no nonentity defect. This factor of no zero defect with the Huxley 3D printer can be blamed on management. Perhaps, its worker are not motivated and recognised accordingly toward a personal interest in their job and or lacks doing procedures where for all(prenominal) final parts produced requires an inspection to ensuring quality. The lack of no zero defect was clearly observed in the bolts and nuts, frame rod, and thermoplastics frame parts.furthermore, since Huxley produces large intensiveness of components part (mass production) they should adopt the principle of zero defect primarily counseling on preventive methodology zero defect of its worker towards a constant, cauti ous, and right attitude of work within its organization to ensuring quality at every level of production. This methodology if adopted will impact expectant welfares to the companys general growth, brand recognition and improved their advantage maximisation.The American-Romanian quality guru Joseph Moses an advocator of quality and total quality management defines quality in term of fitness for purpose as evaluation of how well a product perfumes for its intended use. Since the primary function of the Huxley 3D printer is to print 3D designs preconceived from any computer support design software (CAD) and as observed during the course of the study, it perform this function to satisfactory printing various component parts simple and complex it can then be established that the fitness for purpose postulated by Joseph Moses is satisfied hence Huxley would need to fine-tune and improve on its period standards for quality with fitness of purpose because without standard there is no lo gical basis for making a decision in taking actions (Philip 2008) to provide its teaming customers with not just a 3D printing machine but one that can stand global competitive market in quality and functions.Although, it is assumed that Huxley already adopt this methodology in its production and quality management structures but it would do the company more benefit fine-tuning to achieving a more global qualitative product.William Bill Conway advocates for continuous value in product development for quality a concept that put the American ford company into world breaking record in operational effectiveness. Huxley 3D printer was made an open solution on the internet to serves as empowering tool for product improvement, the need to train and prepare its staff is another way a strategy to continuous improvement of product for quality. A company growth depends on the ability of its management strengths for a consistent improvement which further translate to efficiency and effectiv eness in operations. It is conceived that Huxley Company applied this methodology via internet open source with continuous research as well. In this way, a substantial improvement on the component parts of the worked on Huxley 3D printer has been updated and new model are produced. With maintaining this methodology and exploring other related method constants product improvement can be sustained with enormous benefits.ReferencesRoberts, T. (2014) product development for quality EEB_7_877 lecture note quality gurus, Huxley 3D printer, LR-313, London South Bank University, twenty-fifth March, 2014. Available from http//www.blackboard.ac.ukWikipedia article (2014) online accessed 28th 04, 2014 available from http// www.reprapro.comGoogle scope (2014) online accessed 30th, 2014 available from http//www.google.com/imagegoogle article (2014) online accessed 4th, 2014 available from http//www.google.com