The Ineptitude Of The United S :: essays research papers

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their noble with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Those are the initiation lines to the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence was written in 1776. Yet, slavery act in the unite States for nearly ninety years after this account declared that "all men where created equal," and those "unalienable rights" are still non shared by everyone in the unify States. The U.S. has been lacking in its indebtedness to its citizens. The area right for human and civil rights must be expand in the linked States.In December 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The thirty articles of the UDHR were developed to bear a clear definition of human rights. It and whence became the tariff of the affirms of the United Nations to p rotect those rights. This is where the United States is lacking. The U.S. is one of the founding nations of the United Nations and one of the approximately influential, yet it has failed to take adequate pronounce responsibility for human rights. forwards the ineptitude of the United States can be discussed, the concept of state responsibility for human and civil rights must be clearly defined. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines state as "a politically organized body of people ordinarily occupying a definite territory," and responsibility as "moral, legal, or mental accountability." These definitions of state and responsibility can be interpreted and combined to provide a literal definition of state responsibility. The definition of state responsibility could then be seen as "the moral and legal accountability of a government." A concise notion of state responsibility for human and civil rights would then be congruent to "the moral and legal accoun tability of government for life, liberty, security, and all other finite right of a person." With the concept of state responsibility for human and civil rights having been defined, the extent of state responsibility in the United States can be discussed. Rhonda Copelon once noted, "the nearly limited conception of state responsibility in the United States has been essentially dismantled." Copelon also made a bidding to the effect that rights in the U.S. are limited to constraints on government and that they do not reach private conduct or include the most basic social and economic needs.