Thursday, February 7, 2019
Animal Farm - The End Justifed the Means :: Animal Farm Essays
END Achieve freedom from manhood and be able to look by and by themselvesThe substance to get this was by Napoleon and Snowball taking charge and organizing the events in the other animals lives prune To whom was justification needed?-Other Animals -PigsThe animals believed that whatever the manner, no matter how profound their lives would become, all would turn out for the best. Therefore, Squealer and Napoleon were able to disembarrass this federal agency to an shoemakers last for them. Napoleon and Squealer were happy and felt that the means was justified because they were favord over the others.HOWEVER WAS IT JUSTIFIED?Most people would swan no, the land up does not justify the means because the pigs were cruel. However the means can be justified because the animals knew what the means would be, and the end that they had accepted the means for did not include cruel pigs. They felt that as long as the end was easily for everyone, the means was justified.What the pe ople mean when they say that the end does not justify the means because the pigs are cruel is that they dont like how the end that all the animals were looking forward to did not eventuate. This didnt happen because there were in actual fact two ends, not one. Both the pigs and the other animals felt that the means had been justified, but unbeknown to the other animals, the pigs had a different goal. The means of giving Napoleon absolute index number to let all animals have freedom and the ability to look after themselves was justified, however, unfortunately, due to the power which corrupted him, Napoleon never let this end get achieved. Napoleon changed the purpose for which this means was to be used. It is the pigs end of benefiting themselves exclusively and dominating the other animals that does not justify the means. It is this end that people mention to when they do not agree with this statement, because this end is not a good end.Of course, the pigs thought that their en d was good, but it wasnt because they only wanted to advantage a minority and didnt care about the other animals. It wasnt enough for them that they succeeded in living comfortably, everyone else had to fail and struggle to live.The means
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment